|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
[Clinical trials] |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
multidisciplinary teamworking, 216 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
multiple projects, 212-215 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
quantity, quality, and timeliness, 210-212 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
realism, 204-208 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
role of senior management, 208, 215 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Commercial attractiveness of project portfolio, 31, 32 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Communication |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
fostering communication channels in alliances, 153 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
IT and, 265 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
managing an international project team and, 104-106 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
model for communication between sponsor and CRO, 184, 185 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Computer Aided New Drug Applications (CANDAs), 267 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Contracted clinical R&D, 161-186 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
actions following proposal award to CRO, 176-181 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
actions within the CRO, 176-179 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
actions within the sponsor, 179-181 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
approaches to selecting a CRO, 166-169 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
communication model for sponsor and CRO, 184, 185 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
essential steps taken when contracting out studies, 164-166 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
preferred partnerships, 169-171 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
preliminary budget proposals, 173, 174 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
[Contracted clinical R&D] |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
preparing a fully costed proposal, 174-176 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
rationale for contracting studies to CRO, 162-164 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
response by CRO to request for proposal, 172, 173 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
virtual organization and increased use of CROs, 276 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
when things go wrong, 181-185 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
pharmaceutical company perspective, 181, 182 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
project management within the CRO, 182-185 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Contract research organization (CRO). See Contracted clinical R&D |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Core team, 89-91 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Cost of development, 30, 31 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Cross-functional high-performance teams, 273-275 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
project management and, 278 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Cultural concerns raised by portfolio review process, 47, 48 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Customized drug delivery devices, 188-189 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Decision trees, 35-37 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Defense industry |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
control of projects, 83-100 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
assessment of projects, 84, 85 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
background and situation status, 83, 84 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
critical success factors, 86 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
framework of control, 92-97 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
management of change, 85, 86 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
organizational structure, 87-92 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
outcome, 98-100 |
|
|
|
|
|