< previous page page_84 next page >

Page 84
industry toward changing to survive. Internally, the new fixed-price contracts were consistently late with payments delayed and reduced profitability. Our reputation was being seriously damaged, and there was too much firefighting by the senior managers.
The opportunity to change came when different divisions were combined as part of the industry rationalization with the project managers using vastly different systems to control the business. To compound this problem, the various functional heads within the organization, who controlled the staff, also tried to control the project progress without the responsibility for achievement. As they were only really concerned with ensuring that their own staff was successful, the projects reeled from one functional baron's whims to the next. This was great in the cost-plus days but not when we had to make a profit on fixed price contracts.
B.
Knowing What to Aim For
The projects were assessed to see which problem areas really existed. It soon became clear that there was little or no control and that the major problem areas were
no ability to measure spending vs. achievement or cost to completion
No mechanisms to use the program to
3a2af372a540e460b69ba6aec2b32999.gif
control the schedule
3a2af372a540e460b69ba6aec2b32999.gif
predict schedule problems (rather than when they are fait accompli)
3a2af372a540e460b69ba6aec2b32999.gif
replan when changes occur
no processes to ensure that only one person is accountable for spending and achievement, to give all staff access to the program, or to create a team spirit that looks upon achievement as the norm rather than the exception.
This gave rise to a number of primary issues that had to be resolved if we were to remain in business. In summary they were
to break the work into manageable packages
to give accountability, responsibility, and authority to members of a project team reporting to the project manager
to have a resourced PERT network with each package of work linked together
to have good communication of changing program priorities
to report variances to plan and the appropriate actions to recover
to ensure that all staff had clear roles and responsibilities

 
< previous page page_84 next page >