GLP-1 receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes - state-of-the-art


Abstract

Background: GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) with exenatide b.i.d. first approved to treat type 2 diabetes in 2005 have been further developed to yield effective compounds/preparations that have overcome the original problem of rapid elimination (short half-life), initially necessitating short intervals between injections (twice daily for exenatide b.i.d.).

Scope of review: To summarize current knowledge about GLP-1 receptor agonist.

Major conclusions: At present, GLP-1 RAs are injected twice daily (exenatide b.i.d.), once daily (lixisenatide and liraglutide), or once weekly (exenatide once weekly, dulaglutide, albiglutide, and semaglutide). A daily oral preparation of semaglutide, which has demonstrated clinical effectiveness close to the once-weekly subcutaneous preparation, was recently approved. All GLP-1 RAs share common mechanisms of action: augmentation of hyperglycemia-induced insulin secretion, suppression of glucagon secretion at hyper- or euglycemia, deceleration of gastric emptying preventing large post-meal glycemic increments, and a reduction in calorie intake and body weight. Short-acting agents (exenatide b.i.d., lixisenatide) have reduced effectiveness on overnight and fasting plasma glucose, but maintain their effect on gastric emptying during long-term treatment. Long-acting GLP-1 RAs (liraglutide, once-weekly exenatide, dulaglutide, albiglutide, and semaglutide) have more profound effects on overnight and fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c, both on a background of oral glucose-lowering agents and in combination with basal insulin. Effects on gastric emptying decrease over time (tachyphylaxis). Given a similar, if not superior, effectiveness for HbA1c reduction with additional weight reduction and no intrinsic risk of hypoglycemic episodes, GLP-1RAs are recommended as the preferred first injectable glucose-lowering therapy for type 2 diabetes, even before insulin treatment. However, GLP-1 RAs can be combined with (basal) insulin in either free- or fixed-dose preparations. More recently developed agents, in particular semaglutide, are characterized by greater efficacy with respect to lowering plasma glucose as well as body weight. Since 2016, several cardiovascular (CV) outcome studies have shown that GLP-1 RAs can effectively prevent CV events such as acute myocardial infarction or stroke and associated mortality. Therefore, guidelines particularly recommend treatment with GLP-1 RAs in patients with pre-existing atherosclerotic vascular disease (for example, previous CV events). The evidence of similar effects in lower-risk subjects is not quite as strong. Since sodium/glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor treatment reduces CV events as well (with the effect mainly driven by a reduction in heart failure complications), the individual risk of ischemic or heart failure complications should guide the choice of treatment. GLP-1 RAs may also help prevent renal complications of type 2 diabetes. Other active research areas in the field of GLP-1 RAs are the definition of subgroups within the type 2 diabetes population who particularly benefit from treatment with GLP-1 RAs. These include pharmacogenomic approaches and the characterization of non-responders. Novel indications for GLP-1 RAs outside type 2 diabetes, such as type 1 diabetes, neurodegenerative diseases, and psoriasis, are being explored. Thus, within 15 years of their initial introduction, GLP-1 RAs have become a well-established class of glucose-lowering agents that has the potential for further development and growing impact for treating type 2 diabetes and potentially other diseases.

Keywords: Albiglutide; Body weight; Cardiovascular disease; Dulaglutide; Exenatide; Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; Liraglutide; Lixisenatide; Semaglutide; Type 2 diabetes.

Figures

Figure?1
Figure?1
Arrows indicate the time from injection (or oral administration in the case of oral semaglutide) to peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) for GLP-1 RAs (Tmax). For references, please see [20]. Peak plasma concentrations may determine the time when nausea and vomiting are observed with GLP-1 RA treatment. The extremely slow absorption of once-weekly exenatide does not allow identification of a peak.
Figure?2
Figure?2
Recommendations issued in official package inserts regarding the necessity for slow up-titration of approved GLP-1 receptor agonists.
Figure?3
Figure?3
Optical appearance and properties of pen injection devices for approved GLP-1 receptor agonists (as mono substances or fixed-dose combinations with basal insulin). Modified from Nauck and Meier 2019 [20]. ?Thorough shaking was necessary to evenly resuspend the active ingredient. The ease of use was estimated semi-quantitatively based on informal feedback from patients using these pen injection devices.
Figure?4
Figure?4
Comparison of approved GLP-1 RAs with respect to their effectiveness in reducing HbA1C (A), fasting plasma glucose (B), and body weight (C). A linear regression analysis relating reductions in fasting plasma glucose to reductions in HbA1c is shown in panel D. A comparison of the reported coefficients of variation for reducing HbA1c and body weight is displayed in panel E. All data are from clinical trials reporting head-to-head comparisons between various GLP-1 RAs (exenatide b.i.d. vs lixisenatide [36], exenatide b.i.d. vs liraglutide [37], lixisenatide vs liraglutide [38], exenatide once-weekly vs liraglutide [39], albiglutide vs liraglutide [40], dulaglutide vs liraglutide [41], subcutaneous semaglutide vs dulaglutide [42], and oral semaglutide vs liraglutide [43]) on a background of oral glucose-lowering agents. Data concerning the same GLP-1 RA were pooled using conventional equations to calculate common means and their standard deviations.
Figure?5
Figure?5
Meta-analysis comparing effects of short- and long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists added to basal insulin in HbA1c (A), HbA1c target (≤7.0%) achievement (B), fasting plasma glucose (C), and body weight (D). For each variable, the results were significantly better for long-acting compounds (liraglutide, once-weekly exenatide, dulaglutide, and semaglutide based on 6 studies) compared to short-acting compounds (exenatide b.i.d. and lixisenatide based on 8 studies). Both studies with free and fixed-dose combinations were analyzed. Modified from [50].
Figure?6
Figure?6
Schematic diagram demonstrating how various methods of GLP-1 or GLP-1 RA administration into the general circulation can reach and influence brain areas involved in the regulation of energy intake and expenditure [72,73]. (A) Evidence also suggests that GLP-1 receptors in the hepatoportal region [75] (B) and on afferent parasympathetic nerve endings in the intestinal mucosa (C) [76] may generate central nervous system signals influencing insulin secretion and metabolism. Stimulatory signals (+) are shown in green, inhibitory (?) signals are depicted in red, and afferent parasympathetic (vagal) signals are denoted in blue. See the text for a more detailed explanation of the mechanisms.
Figure?7
Figure?7
Results of cardiovascular outcome studies comparing GLP-1 RAs with placebo on a background of standard of care. (A) Reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: time to first event) in published individual clinical trials. (B) Results of a published meta-analysis [108] analyzing various cardiovascular endpoints across all of the clinical trials shown in panel A. MACE (a combination of either cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke) was the primary endpoint in all studies. Meta-analysis results are supplemented with I2 and related p values indicating the heterogeneity of the analysis of individual endpoints (column of panels to the far right) as reported in [108].
Figure?8
Figure?8
Regression analysis of differences achieved in HbA1c concentrations between patients treated with placebo and active drug vs hazard ratios for major adverse cardiovascular outcomes (MACE; A), cardiovascular death (B), non-fatal stroke (C), non-fatal myocardial infarction (D), and hospitalization for heart failure (E) reported from cardiovascular outcome studies with GLP-1 receptor agonists (red), SGLT-2 inhibitors (blue), and DPP-4 inhibitors (green). Significant associations are shown for MACE (A) and non-fatal stroke (C) with similar slopes of the regression lines, while for cardiovascular death (B) and non-fatal myocardial infarction (D), a less prominent, non-significant correlation resulted from the analysis. Regarding hospitalization for heart failure (E), hazard ratios did not vary with HbA1c reduction. Analyzing GLP-1 receptor agonists only resulted in significant correlations for MACE and stroke as well as previously reported by Caruso et?al. [119] but not for the other endpoints. Numbers in symbols identify the clinical trials: 1: SUSTAIN-6 (subcutaneous semaglutide) [100], 2: PIONEER-6 (oral semaglutide) [101], 3: REWIND (dulaglutide) [98], 4: LEADER (liraglutide) [96], 5: EXCSEL (once-weekly exenatide) [97], 6: ELIXA (lixisenatide) [95], 7: EMPA-REG Outcomes (empagliflozin) [120], 8: DECLARE-TIMI-58 (dapagliflozin) [121], 9: CANVAS program (canagliflozin) [122]; 10: VERTIS-CV (ertugliflozin, presented at the 80th scientific session of the American Diabetes Association); 11: EXAMINE (alogliptin) [123], 12 CARMELINA (linagliptin) [124], 13: SAVOR-TIMI-53 (saxagliptin) [125], and 14: TECOS (sitagliptin) [126].
Figure?9
Figure?9
Mechanisms driving the development of atherosclerotic lesions in patients with type 2 diabetes (A) and effects of GLP-1 RAs on the progression of atherogenesis and the development of its complications (B). See the text for further details on the mechanisms involved and references to the supporting literature. EC: endothelial cell, eNOS: endothelial nitrous oxide synthase, ICAM-1: intercellular adhesion molecule-1, IL: interleukin, KLF-2: Krüppel-like factor-2, LDL: low-density lipoprotein, MCP-1: monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, NO: nitrous oxide, oxLDL: oxidized low-density lipoprotein, ROS: reactive oxygen species, TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor, VCAM-1: vascular cell adhesion protein 1, VSMC: vascular smooth muscle cell.

Similar articles