< previous page page_294 next page >

Page 294
6fb6ffc4153cdc534470145c4eef46f0.gif
12. R. Comis. Oral etoposide: a developing role. Eur. J. Cancer 27(Suppl. 2): 5348, 1991.
6fb6ffc4153cdc534470145c4eef46f0.gif
13. D. Bissett, A. Steanoians, J. Cassidy, M. A. Graham, G. A. Chadwick, P. Wilson, V. Auzannet, N. Le Bail, S. B. Kaye, and D. J. Kerr. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of taxotere (RP 56976) administered as a 24 hour infusion. Cancer Research 53: 523527, 1993.
6fb6ffc4153cdc534470145c4eef46f0.gif
14. J. Cassidy. Chemotherapy administration: doses, infusions and choice of schedule. Annals of Oncology 5(Suppl. 4): 2530, 1994.
6fb6ffc4153cdc534470145c4eef46f0.gif
15. J. M. Collins, D. S. Zaharko, R. Dedrick, et al. Potential roles for preclinical pharmacology in phase I clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rep 70: 7380, 1986.
6fb6ffc4153cdc534470145c4eef46f0.gif
16. EORTC pharmacokinetics and metabolism group. Pharmacokinetically guided dose escalation in phase I clinical trials. Eur. J. Can. Clin. Oncol. 23: 10831087, 1987.
6fb6ffc4153cdc534470145c4eef46f0.gif
17. M. A. Graham and P. Workman. The impact of pharmacokinetically guided dose escalation strategies in phase I clinical trials: Critical evaluation and recommendations for future studies. Annals of Oncology 3: 338349, 1992.
6fb6ffc4153cdc534470145c4eef46f0.gif
18. J. O'Quigley, M. Pepe, and L. Fisher. Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase I clinical trials in cancer. Biometrics 46: 3348, 1990.
6fb6ffc4153cdc534470145c4eef46f0.gif
19. D. Faries. The modified continual reassessment method for Phase I cancer clinical trials. Proc. of Amer. Stat. Assoc. 1991.
6fb6ffc4153cdc534470145c4eef46f0.gif
20. W. E. Evans, J. H. Rodman, M. V. Relling, W. R. Crom, G. K. Rivera, C. B. Pratt, and W. M. Crist. Concept of maximal tolerated systemic exposure and its application to phase I-II studies of anticancer drugs. Medical and Paediatric Oncology 19: 153159, 1991.
6fb6ffc4153cdc534470145c4eef46f0.gif
21. J. Cassidy. Biological end points in early clinical trials of antineoplastic drugs. CRC Beatson Laboratories Scientific Report 2123, 1993.
6fb6ffc4153cdc534470145c4eef46f0.gif
22. S. K. Carter. Study design principles of the clinical evaluation of new drugs as developed by the chemotherapy program of the National Cancer Institute. In The Design of Clinical Trials in Cancer Therapy. M. Staquet, Ed. Brussels, Editions Scientifique Europeennes, 1973, p. 242247.
6fb6ffc4153cdc534470145c4eef46f0.gif
23. G. Schwartsmann, J. Wanders, I. J. Koier, et al. EORTC New Drug Development Office co-ordinating and monitoring programme for phase I and II trials with new anticancer agents. Eur. J. Cancer 27: 11621168, 1991.
6fb6ffc4153cdc534470145c4eef46f0.gif
24. F. M. Muggia, M. Rozencweig, M. J. Stawuet, and W. P. McGuire. In Methodology of Phase II Trials in Cancer. S. K. Carter and Y. Sakurai, Eds. New anticancer agents. Springer, New York, 1980.
6fb6ffc4153cdc534470145c4eef46f0.gif
25. S. B. Kaye, P. Workman, M. A. Graham, J. Cassidy, and D. Jodrell. Pharmacokinetics and early clinical studies of selected new drugs. Cancer Surveys 17: 371395, 1993.
6fb6ffc4153cdc534470145c4eef46f0.gif
26. J. Cassidy and S. B. Kaye. New drugs in clinical development in Europe. Haematology/Oncology Clinics of North America 8: 289303, 1994.
6fb6ffc4153cdc534470145c4eef46f0.gif
27. J. Carmichael. Cancer chemotherapy: identifying novel anticancer drugs. Br. Med. J. 308: 12881290, 1994.

 
< previous page page_294 next page >