|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
[Manufacturing project management] |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
changing demands of each phase of product development, 238-244 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
full commercialization, 243 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
molecule selection, 238, 239 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
patent expiry defense strategy, 243, 244 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
phase II/III, 241, 242 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
phase IV/launch, 242, 243 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
preclinical phase I/II, 239-241 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
conflicting objectives, 237, 238 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
interlocking project structure, 244-246 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
key issues facing, 236 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
manufacturing philosophy, 236, 237 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
manufacturing project management group, 246-248 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
technical support structure, 248-251 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
worldwide production, 251, 252 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Mechanical testing of drug delivery devices, 197 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Miniaturization, 22 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Monte Carlo simulation, 36-38 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Multiattribute analysis, 37-39 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Multidisciplinary teamwork for clinical research projects, 205, 206, 216 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Multiproject planning, information systems for, 78, 79 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Network plans, 72, 73 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Network software for project planning, 77-80 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
New percent value (NPV), 39, 42 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Open data base connectivity (ODBC) for single project systems, 78 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Optimizing the project plan, 61-70 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
clinical development, 68, 69 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
manufacturing development, 69, 70 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
phase I, 67, 68 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
toxicology and safety investigations, 66, 67 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Option pricing analysis, 38, 39 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Organizational concerns raised by portfolio review process, 47, 48 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Personal productivity tool |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
IT as, 264 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Pharmacoeconomics |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Interest groups, 16 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
PICAS data base, 224, 225 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Portfolio review and analysis, 25-49 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
data gathering and review, 32-34 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
IT as aid to portfolio management, 281, 282 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
link between strategic goals and operational plans, 27 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
organizational issues, 47, 48 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
overview of portfolio review process, 28, 29 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
results, 39-47 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
resources and costs, 43-45 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
risk/reward, 39-43 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
strategic issues, 45-49 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
review inputs, 29-32 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
commercial attractiveness, 31, 32 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
R&D feasibility, 30 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
research potential, 29, 30 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
resources and costs, 30, 31 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
review methodologies, 34-38 |
|
|
|
|
|